Water, aqueducts and fountains
Introduction:
Aqueducts in Antiquity
Water has generally been a luxury which we today (until we go camping) tend to take for
granted. According to the horizons of civilized living from Hellenistic times until the fall
of the Empire in the West (and taken up again in Constantinople), a plentiful supply of
water was essential for the luxuries of life, as expressed in the institution of the bath,
which was a social and sporting complex rather than just a communal bath for keeping clean.
Rome, the capital of the Empire, had the largest complex of aqueducts anywhere, feeding some
QUANTITIES cubic meters daily to the City from HOW MANY aqueducts.
The figures for the aqueducts of Rome in full spate are
very impressive. the Aqua Virgo discharged 100,160 cubic meters per 24 hours,
and the lot - i.e. the 502km of the 11 aqueducts of Rome
- dumped 1,127,220 cubic meters per 24 hours! (Hodge 1991, 347 for
flow statistics). Today, water reaches our houses
under pressure: we turn on the tap, and out it comes. In other words, water today is stored
until it is needed. Although there are plenty of antique examples of water
piped to houses from high tanks, and run off when needed (e.g. Pompeii),
this was impossible with aqueducts, which delivered their water
day in, day out. Much of it went into two kinds of conspicuous display,
namely the great baths, and fountains, the terminal points of which were
usually called a castellum or a nymphaeum, this latter
name redolent of mythology. Although many monumental fountains
were used for collecting household water, any residue simply seeped away,
and eventually into the Tiber. The great Baths declined, even if a few
clergy made use of the water supply to implant baptisteries on the site;
bathing as a pleasurable activity also declined, with some strict
mediaeval strictures against communal bathing, especially in monasteries.
But the tradition of the fountain, reborn during the Renaissance, survived and
prospered; and the desire to make a show involving sculpture, rocks, water,
and even cascades - usually called the mostra, the modern version of
the castellum - survives with it. Although not exclusively
a Roman tradition - there were, after all, working monumental fountains
in Perugia and Siena in DATE, long before we find any in Rome - it is
nevertheless to Rome that sufficient quantities of water could be channeled
to make a show.
The Popes and Water Supply
It was the repair of the aqueducts by the rulers of Rome - the Papacy - that made Rome into a city once
again that could stand comparison with its antique (and idealized) image. Today, there are
the following monumental fountains in Rome excluding Vatican City, which exclude of course the small fountain-basins
made from sarcophagi, or the simple stand-pipes on every street:
Since it was the repair of the aqueducts that enabled the construction of
the fountains along their length or at their terminal, here are some of
the most famous, arranged by aqueduct:
- Acqua Felice, 1585, by Sixtus V (Felix Peretti, hence
the name of the water supply):
- 1587-8: del Moise, Domenico Fontana
- 4 Fontane;
- 4 Fontane;
and the same thing
- uncleaned;
- 1643: del Tritone, Bernini
- 1513: della Navicella, by Leo X
- Quirinal
- 1818: Dioscuri, Pius VII (Quirinal)
- Campidoglio and AraCoeli
- Viale della Trinita dei Monti
- Piazza Campitelli
- Acqua Vergine (Antica e Nuova). Nicholas V began reconstructing
the Vergine Antica in 1453, with a mostra near the present
Trevi, for which Leon Battista Alberti designed a long simple basin
fed by three streams.
- Piazza del Popolo
- Piazza Colonna
- 1627-9: della Barcaccia;, Pietro Bernini
- Pantheon
- 1640ff: di Trevi, begun by Bernini, completed by Salvi in 1732-51
- 1581-4: delle Tartarughe, Giacomo della Porta
- Acqua Paola:
- Paola: Trastevere
- In front of SM in Trasetevere;
- Fontana del Prigione (Trastevere)
- 16thC: del Mascherone (Via Giulia)
- Piazza Farnese
- S Peters Square
- 1651: Fiumi, Bernini (Piazza Navona)
- 1654: del Moro, designed by Bernini (Piazza Navona)
- 1576: del Nettuno, perhaps by della Porta (Piazza Navona)
- 1613: di ponte Sisto, Giovanni Fontana (moved here from Via Giulia)
- dell'Anfora
- Acqua Pia Antica Marcia:
- 1635: di Giulio III with arms of Colonna placed here at this date (Via Flaminia)
- Villa Giulia nymphaeum
- 1644, delle Api, Bernini
- 1590: della Terrina (moved to Piazza della Chiesa Nuova from Campo dei Fiori in 1924)
- 1791: Cavalli Marini, Unterberger (Villa Borghese)
- 1786: Eusculapius, Asprucci (Villa Borghese)
- 1929: Fauni, Nicolini (Villa Borghese)
- 1885: delle Naiadi, Guerrieri (Piazza della Repubblica)
where do the following go:
- date: della botticella
- mid-17thC: del Giglio, perhaps Algardi (Villa Doria Pamphili)
- 1930s: del Globo (Foro Italico)
- Peschiera: where?
We may estimate that in 1500 there were HOW MANY, 1600, 1700,
1800. This decline in the number of fountains is matched by that in Istanbul, which counted
over 50% more in the 16th century than it does today DETAILS.
What did the Renaissance know about antique fountains?
If we are to maintain (as the Renaissance itself did) the antique inspiration for much of its building
activity, then one conundrum is exactly what the Renaissance knew about ancient fountains (except
from literary sources. We know from excavated and restored theHellenistic and Roman
cities such as Side and Aspendos that fountains were often monumental in scale and
rich inn bas-reliefs and sculpture in the round. Wed might think of the Fontana di
Trevi as the post-antique equivalent to Plancia Magna's work at Aspendos - but we
have no evidence that the Renaissance or Baroque periods knew about such stupendously
elaborate eye-stoppers, All we do know is that the Renaissance Popes, again aping the ancient
Romans in this as in so many other respects, initiated the repair of
many of the aqueducts essential as feeders for the monumental fountains they constructed.
The state of Roman aqueducts in the 15th century
Kept in repair, the aqueducts could make the highest hills of Rome habitable: the Palatine,
with its cooling breezes, was made so by its aqueduct. Aqueducts in Antiquity were carefully
guarded (farmers tended to pilfer the water along the way), and regularly repaired. When
they broke and went unrepaired, then land out in the Campagna became marshy and eventually
mosquito-infested. Malaria then caused depopulation. Similarly, habitation on the Palatine
came to an end when the aqueducts broke. In mediaeval Rome, only the low-lying area
in the bend of the Tiber - the Campus Martius, still a working-class area - remained
habitable, because water could be drawn from the river (not to be recommended today). Higher
areas were abandoned (cf the various maps of Rome: hotlinks!!).
But what happened to the aqueducts and the water supply
when the former were no longer regularly maintained?
Indeed, did aqueducts survive antiquity? At Rome, some did, or were
rebuilt at various periods. In Gaul, A Guillerme (1983)
concludes that about half the aqueducts were still going strong
in the Merovingian period; and that subsequently, they declined
where urbanity declined, and fountains and baths were no longer
needed. He dismisses out-of-hand the hoary notion that
that they were broken because of barbarians after lead.
Unfortunately, Hodges
has little information on the supply end after distribution - i.e.
fountains and the rest - without which the aqueducts were
pointless and even dangerous, as wholesale leakage would cause
swamping and malaria, as noted above. Unfortunately, then, we know next
to nothing about the nature of the fountains into which the aqueducts
debouched - and hence exactly the same about putative antique sources
for Renaissance fountains.
If acqueducts survived whilst they were still of use - that is,
whilst urban civilization flourished or at least faltered along, and
something could be done with the water at the "business end", then
looking at the usage of Roman baths should help tell us about
the state of the aqueducts. Unfortunately, this is a topic that writers
on ancient baths avoid (cf. Nielsen 1993: this is a good general survey, but doesn't deal with
the decline of the baths, or their conversion into baptisteries etc etc).
The Renaissance and ancient fountains
How did the Renaissance know what ancient fountains looked like? They had Frontinus' tgext
on aqueducts and, of course, crawling around aqueducts with this text in hand soon told
one how they worked, and what was needed to repair them. In Rome or indeed the Italian
Peninsula, no monumental fountains survived intact from Antiquity, but there were plenty of
ruins, many of them focussed in antique complexes such as Hadrian's Villa, itself the
inspiration for the Villa d'Este, further up the hill in Tivoli itself.
Generally,
The Popes were fond of erecting inscriptions trumpeting their justifiable
pride at getting the waters flowing again, as for example at the hospital
adjacent to
- S Giovanni in Laterano;
- S Giovanni in Laterano;
Conclusion
Today, thanks to the example of the antique so readily followed by the Renaissance and
Baroque popes, Rome still has a profusion of fountains of drinking water (the connoisseurs
claim to be able to tell from which aqueduct the different flavours of water descend).